Decision Review

What is your next signature actually resting on?

Send one decision. We send back what you're really deciding, what it rests on, and what only you can answer, so you can defend it without us in the room. Pick your seat to see a real exchange, anonymized.

What you send

“The team wants to switch our in-flight validation to CSA. I think it's a bad move.”

Lab informatics · Validation lead · Program lead · one sentence, no attachments

What comes back CSV to CSA mid-project · Confidence: Medium

Settled. Executed scripted evidence carries over. A switch needs a mapping, not re-execution.

Settled. Part 11 obligations don't change under either method.

Default. Finish under the approved CSV plan. Move only the unexecuted remainder, and only if your SOP permits it and your own counts show a saving.

Your three facts. SOP wording · count of not-high-risk tests left · whether the system is in the guidance's scope.

Send one decision
0 Executed tests that must be re-run to change method
3 Facts from your own SOP and counts decide it
12 Transition risks, each with a named control
What you send

“How do we qualify our literature review tool for GxP?”

Head of PV · VP Quality · COO · one sentence, no attachments

What comes back Pharmacovigilance · Confidence: Medium

You're actually deciding. How to close a compliance gap that already exists. Weekly literature monitoring was a legal obligation before anyone called it GxP.

Do first. Open a deviation and CAPA, check a sample of past screening per region, then qualify the tool by risk.

Set aside. Qualifying the tool first. A system can't be shown fit for a process nobody has written down.

Only you can answer. Is there a supplier assessment of the platform's audit trail and release terms?

Send one decision
1 reply Turned a software project into a compliance remediation
10 Gaps in the original question, each tied to a regulation
45 min Across three rounds of refinement
What you send

“Screening done before the GxP cutover needs no retrospective action.”

QA · Compliance · Internal audit · one sentence, no attachments

What comes back Assumption register · Confidence: Medium

Discard. Monitoring was already an obligation (GVP Module VI). Past screening is part of the regulated record.

Discard. “The vendor's hosting covers retention.” Records must stay retrievable for the life of the authorization plus 10 years, in an archive you control.

Challenge. “Reviewers apply the same unwritten rules.” Never measured, and less likely across separate regional teams.

Unverified, flagged. The platform's audit trail, access controls and e-signature. Settled by a supplier assessment.

Send one decision
31 Facts traced to a source, 2 flagged as unverified
23 Assumptions sorted: verified, challenged or discarded
13 Rejected routes on the record, each with its reason
What you send

“How should the board judge readiness to exit the transition services agreement by month 24?”

Board · CFO · Investor · one sentence, no attachments

What comes back Carve-out with GxP services · Confidence: Medium

Weakest link. Every dollar figure came from the brief, not the contract. Each is flagged, and the band says so.

First board question. Do TSA fees count against the one-time budget? If yes, the program is about $26M over before it starts.

Set aside. “The extension is our buffer.” It needs the seller's consent at twice the rate.

Would change it. Reading the extension, notice and pricing clauses, and the retention plan.

Send one decision
$236M Of fees against a $210M budget: over on day one?
~41× Swing in the cost of slipping, set by one contract clause
9 of 21 Inputs flagged as unread at source

You bring the facts only you have. We do the rest.

  1. You Send one decision In your own words. No documents and no system access at this step.
  2. We Return a one-page read What you're deciding, what it rests on, what only you can answer.
  3. You Answer what you can Each answer is checked at source and the review runs again.
  4. We Hand over the record A decision record you sign, a one-page brief for each seat, and a dated list of open items.

Fixed fee. Rounds included.

First Read One decision, one round. The smallest way to start. Fixed, small · a few days
Decision Desk Reviews every quarter, one running record, open items carried forward. Quarterly retainer

No system access · You keep the analysis · You decide, and you sign

Bring the argument your team keeps having.

A First Read separates what's already settled from the few facts that decide the rest, so the next meeting is the last one on it.

Bring one decision before you fund it.

A First Read tells you whether you're solving the right problem, in days, before the budget is committed.

Send us one question. We'll send back better ones.

A First Read shows you what a decision rests on and where the basis is thin, before it reaches your signature.

Bring the plan before it reaches the board.

A First Read names what the plan rests on, which numbers nobody re-derived, and what would overturn it.

What you send
Where to send the answer

Your seat: Informatics & ValidationDecision OwnerQuality & RiskBoard & Audit

No documents needed yet. We'll say what the review needs, and how it's stored, before you send anything.

Received

Thank you. We'll reply with what a First Read needs, usually within one business day.

Worked examples are anonymized. A review informs your decision and does not replace it.